The Source for Whistleblowers, Journalists, Legislators & Academics

Justice Takes Side of Landis

Washington, DC — It looks like the false claims case against Lance Armstrong, which was brought by Floyd Landis, will finally see the light of day.

It is reported that the United States Department of Justice has decided to intervene in the case against Armstrong.

Landis, who brought suit as a whistleblower under the Federal False Claims Act, alleged that Armstrong participated in a scheme to cause the United States Postal Service to wrongfully pay out money to his Tour de France teams.

The apparent decision by the United States Department of Justice to intervene on behalf of Landis means that the government will take responsibility for prosecuting what at least now is a civil matter. It also means that the seal will finally be lifted on the case and litigation, to a large degree, will occur in proceedings that are more transparent then they have been.

As a technical matter, the case brought by Landis still remains under seal even though it was leaked out to a New York newspaper.

The government decision on intervention also probably means that efforts to resolve the case short of full-blown litigation failed.

Unless this matter is resolved in the early stages of litigation, Armstrong will undoubtedly have to participate in court mandated discovery and even submit to a deposition. Unless the court seals the record, the public is likely to hear more about this matter with bloggers salivating about the prospect of reading Armstrong testimony.

Still looming over Armstrong is the prospect of a criminal indictment. The Government’s decision to pursue the false claims case certainly does not rule out that prospect. The United States Department of Justice often pursues both civil and criminal allegations in what are known as parallel proceedings or investigations.

For now, one thing is sure; the false claims case against Lance Armstrong is about to get more interesting.

 

Related posts

The Art of Advocacy

Judges are now insisting that plaintiffs make their case with facts instead of merely...

A Tale of Two Cases

The SEC needs more transparency The SEC needs to begin identifying those receiving bounties...

Benchmarking Law Schools

How should law schools be judged? Reuben Guttman questions the current law school rankings...

A Global Epicentre

Our man at the IBA, Reuben Guttman, is most impressed by a law professor...

Doing the right thing

Are global corporations under just a moral obligation rather than a legal duty to...

Professional melting pot

The International Bar Association has a well-deserved reputation for partying hard at its annual...

Puckering Up

“Whether to blow or not to blow – that intriguing issue triggered heated debate...

“Backing Barack”

The US President wins some heavyweight economic support as Reuben Guttman sees the curtain...

Changing the Debate

CHARLOTTE, NC — Twenty-eight years ago, then New York Governor Mario Cuomo gave a...

It’s all about Ohio

CHARLOTTE, NC — Inside the Democratic National Convention here it is all about winning...

Is Apple Serious?

After years of representing to shareholders that it properly monitors its supply chain for...

Comments are currently closed.

Top